По-моему, он что-то другое имел в виду, но да ладно.

не вписывается, в более менее, реалистичную графику.

So basically Greg was not impressed. He played a 360 version of the game because as told to him by Beenox, that is the version they are concentrating on. That's a little weird, I guess the current gen prob won't have anything better than the previous one. He said the graphics looked ok but there were flat textures though he said he was spoiled after playing a lot of Infamous SS.

He goes on to say the game looks very much like the first one meaning it's "not pretty and highly repetitive." He did like the web swinging and said you have to get into a rhythm to be successful at it but didn't say that he preferred it to SM2s system or didn't even make a comparison. Combat reuses a lot of the same animations but they added things like countering several attackers at once, etc. He commented on the Hero/Menace system and said if you complete a random mission/crime and do it to 100% success you get reward points and are labeled as a hero. If you do anything less, you get labeled a menace and JJJ makes comments about you in the paper. No extra points of course but he said there's absolutely no benefit to being a menace. Sounds kinda lame to me.

Final bit was about playing as Peter Parker. You get to walk around and have conversations with people, like a mission where you go to Wilson Fisk's house for a party or something like that...you get to choose from a set of choices as to what dialogue you'd like to say or ask and then characters respond to you. This was a feature that was in WoS. And here in ASM2, just like in WoS, the dialogue is totally story related, there's no points to be earned and you can skip thru everything. Again, sounds kinda lame to me.

He closes in saying that just like the previous ASM game, all this stuff sounds good on the surface but we'll just have to wait to see how everything comes together. Overall I'd say he was very lukewarm about the game and didn't come away as the game was great.

but didn't say that he preferred it to SM2s system or didn't even make a comparison.

This was a feature that was in WoS

UltraPrimeVinyl8 часов назад

The game doesn't even look that bad...i don't see how games like arkham city or origins look any better...

UltraPrimeVinyl6 часов назад

+TheDosaKing I have played the buggy, broken mess that is origins...the graphics in either game don't look that great at all...just a bunch of grays and browns...this game at least has some interesting lighting and colors....not arkham...

UltraPrimeVinyl8 часов назад

The game doesn't even look that bad...i don't see how games like arkham city look any better...

UltraPrimeVinyl6 часов назад

+TheDosaKing I have played the buggy, broken mess that is origins...the graphics in either game don't look that great at all...just a bunch of grays and browns...this game at least has some interesting lighting and colors....not arkham...

Нет.

Каким образом она может выглядеть хуже игры 2011 года?

Консольный Ориджин выглядит очень так себе.

Он что-нибудь новое сказал? У меня колонки не работают 1.

Ты про какой именно часть говоришь? Графику, или вообще?

ЦЕПЛЯЕТСЯ ЗА ЗДАНИЯ!!!!

Осторожно похвалил идеи, но побоялся за то, как они в итоге будут исполнены

Ну да. На нее же больше всего гонят любители крузисов из 5б класса.

не веб оф шэдовс но уже неплохо

Ну а так графин все равно хуже, чем в Сити. И моя любовь к нему здесь ни при чем

Как он тогда по-твоему может быть хуже в Ориджине, если он там вообще не изменился?